<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is KDE 4.2 too shiny?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/</link>
	<description>Martin Schlander's blog about free software and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Slacker</title>
		<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Slacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mschlander.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-347</guid>
		<description>I agree with Rich... This is great.  I absolutely can&#039;t stand the new KDE setup.  If I wanted vista I would run vista, they have copied everything even the frustrations.  

With this info I can now upgrade to kde 4 and finally let go of kde 3.5

Thanks x 1000.  Plasmoids annoy me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rich&#8230; This is great.  I absolutely can&#8217;t stand the new KDE setup.  If I wanted vista I would run vista, they have copied everything even the frustrations.  </p>
<p>With this info I can now upgrade to kde 4 and finally let go of kde 3.5</p>
<p>Thanks x 1000.  Plasmoids annoy me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mschlander.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-313</guid>
		<description>WOW. That&#039;s exactly what I was looking for. I can use KDE again.

Old school is right. I&#039;ve been on the desktop since &#039;83 (IBM 3B2 300, Unix OS, with a (I think 20 meg) hard drive!!), and I just find the &quot;new school&quot;  funky effects and visuals distracting. My computers are servants, not dancing girls.

Seriously, you should really push this solution for the KDE4 haters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. That&#8217;s exactly what I was looking for. I can use KDE again.</p>
<p>Old school is right. I&#8217;ve been on the desktop since &#8216;83 (IBM 3B2 300, Unix OS, with a (I think 20 meg) hard drive!!), and I just find the &#8220;new school&#8221;  funky effects and visuals distracting. My computers are servants, not dancing girls.</p>
<p>Seriously, you should really push this solution for the KDE4 haters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mschlander.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-244</guid>
		<description>@microchip: The plasmoid is called yaWP (yet another weather plasmoid.) Its the best of the lot that I have found. Search for yawp in your package manager. I have found it in openSUSE, Pardus, Chakra (Arch) and Kubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@microchip: The plasmoid is called yaWP (yet another weather plasmoid.) Its the best of the lot that I have found. Search for yawp in your package manager. I have found it in openSUSE, Pardus, Chakra (Arch) and Kubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microchip</title>
		<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>microchip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mschlander.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m curious about the weather plasmoid you have on the first screenshot. From where did you get it? I&#039;ve tried different weather plasmoids but non offer weather outlook for more than two days like yours does. I&#039;m currently using liquid weather (superkaramba) but I&#039;d like to use a native plasmoid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about the weather plasmoid you have on the first screenshot. From where did you get it? I&#8217;ve tried different weather plasmoids but non offer weather outlook for more than two days like yours does. I&#8217;m currently using liquid weather (superkaramba) but I&#8217;d like to use a native plasmoid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb400f</title>
		<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>cb400f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mschlander.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Thanks, that&#039;s exactly what I wanted to show, that KDE 4.2 can easily be as ugly, boring and old school, as any other desktop to ever hit the market, if that&#039;s your thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, that&#8217;s exactly what I wanted to show, that KDE 4.2 can easily be as ugly, boring and old school, as any other desktop to ever hit the market, if that&#8217;s your thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://mschlander.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/is-kde-42-too-shiny/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mschlander.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Uh..ugly. But the performance (esp. scrolling) is still worse with older hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh..ugly. But the performance (esp. scrolling) is still worse with older hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
